Thanks John. I don't think anyone is under the assumption that JVP's entire motives were altruistic, but I felt that (since the information was posted publicly to begin with) the information to the public on the situation (which I don't think should have been publicized anyway - it would have been better to just state which authors materials were available and which would not be available) should be as accurate as possible. If the information goes out, at least put the information out there without intentionally slamming anyone in the process. If you tell a story, tell the whole story. That is given my limited information as well.

Looking back on it all, I agree with John R though now. I don't think it should have been brought out at all and definitely not here on the UT. That was a BIG mistake (on my part).




>FWIW anything I ever published in FoxTalk (some FRX stuff and other minor articles) that I may retain rights to I pass into the public domain to be reused, copied, or otherwise distributed without regard.
>
>Cheers to Ranier.
>
>>I noticed today that the information on the availability of Foxtalk archives has been updated. I am glad to see so. I think the original write-up was misleading. For anyone interested in the availability of Foxtalk archives:
>>
>>http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives
>>
>>I hope to see the FoxRock succeed.