>Did you see the part where they admitted that global surface temps are decreasing but then go on to say, but the oceans are still warming, well, where is the heat coming from, the basis of their model says this can't happen.
>
>My, the lengths one goes to the try and prove their point of view, especially when your livelyhood depends on it.
>


Here's a good read about historical comparisons to the great global con.

"Al Gore just started a 300 million dollar PR campaign to convince everybody. When was the last time you saw 300 million bucks being spent to promote a scientific hypothesis that was already proven?"

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/the_slick_trick_behind_global.html


>>"Climate Changers,
>>
>>Remember to challenge any piece of media that seems like it's been subject to spin or scepticism."
>>
>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/08/bbc_blog_bully/
>>http://portal.campaigncc.org/node/2089