I still don't get you. You're worried about repercussions over 1 little trade act.

We got this war going on now. And I think you've seen, based on posts from people like Walter, what effect it has caused on world opinion of the US.



>That's what worries me - there could be repercussions on other treaty negotiations going forward because it makes us look untrustworthy.
>
>This was a good treaty - it's unbelievable that Pelosi and others played politics with it. I'm getting a little sick and tired of the current Congress changing rules as it fits them.
>
>>Changing the rules after the fact seems to be a trend with this bunch. However, this time it is not simply affecting a house vote's timing or the Democratic primary, this time they're damaging the ability of the President (office not current occupant) to engage in good-faith treaty negotiations.
>>
>>"The Democratic Party's protectionist make-over was completed yesterday, when Nancy Pelosi decided to kill the Colombia free trade agreement. Her objections had nothing to do with the evidence and everything to do with politics, but this was an act of particular bad faith. It will damage the economic and security interests of the U.S. while trashing our best ally in Latin America."
>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120778566399303309.html