>>I did and it may work, not sure given some of the other posts, but I was able to fit Al's solution into my code within a couple minutes and it's very non-complex. It worked very well with what I needed and now I'm on my way to the next challange.
>
>In this case I disagree - the solution I proposed is simpler than Al's and you may want to incorporate it in the procedure so you would know the technique.

And here we go again. I'm done with this issue. I'm good. Ready to move on. Code is finished. Working great. Please stop. Do not respond any more to this. Thanks.