Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
C# - Add and Update Records
Message
 
To
11/04/2008 16:48:10
Timothy Bryan
Sharpline Consultants
Conroe, Texas, United States
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Coding, syntax and commands
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01309187
Message ID:
01310117
Views:
40
>>Ok, I made some progress, but now I have a question.
>>
>>I created a Typed DataSet and I wrote a simple data access class which returns an instance of the
>>data set.
>>
>>When I look at it in the DataSet Visualizer I see 2 tables - the Typed Dataset and the underlying table.
>>The DataSet has no data, but the table does. I'm not sure this is right, and I surely don't understand
>>it.
>>
>>Can you provide some insight?
>>
>
>I can tell you what I do. I create a typed Data set TruckDataSet for instance but the table name I created inside there is "Trucks" which matches the table name I am going to fill it with. All the fields I create in there are also a match for type and name as the actual columns in the table.
>
>I put an instance on the form where I need to use the data. My DataAccess Layer in this older app has a general routine where I fill the dataSet passed into it.
>
>So When I call it this way:
>DataAccess data = DataAccess.Instance; // I am using a singleton pattern
>
>data.GetAllTrucks(dsTrucks);
>
>The dsTrucks is the name of the dataset I dropped on the form. This way I am passing in the actual dataset I need filled to the data access layer.
>
>Now, I wouldn't do it this way necessarily now because I also have a business layer in the middle. But I think Kevin probably what you are seeing is possibly an issue with the names of the table you added to the DataSet. It needs to match your actual table I think as do the columns.
>
>Try that and see if that is what you see. The layers you will see are a DataSet, a DataTable in there, Rows in the table, and each row will have columns.
>
>See if any of that helps you out.
>Tim


I don't understand this, but I did change the table name to match the SQL table. The column names match and I still get the same results.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
public class SystemCrasher :ICrashable
In addition, an integer field is not for irrational people
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform