Because supposedly they don't exist as a terrorist group any longer and were disbanded (no longer exists as the KLA):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_Liberation_Army

See the The Kosovo War and aftermath (1999-) section...

In reality, I guess it is because they were not attacking Israel or the U.S.? There is undoubtedly a political reason for it, not a moral one. Or more likely this:

Getting history wrong is an essential part of being a nation."
Ernest Renan, French historian

http://samvak.tripod.com/pp56.html




>>The last couple of lines are the most telling...
>>
>>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D902C69O0&show_article=1
>
>Wow... that would be a scenario. Just imagine if anything happened to him. We'd never know that the occupying forces' security wasn't even requested because the US embassy doesn't think it should as much as pass the request on behalf of any US citizen visiting Arafat's grave, even if he's a former president (from wrong party, but that shouldn't matter). It would be open season on Hamas.
>
>BTW (countdown, now), why is Hamas, a political entity formerly classified as a terrorist organization, deemed illegal even though they won the election fair and square, while KLA and their heirs, a political entity formerly classified as a terrorist organization, are forgiven completely? Just because they're in Europe?