>Hi Naomi,
>
>thanks for the correct link ;-)
>
>BTW, i tested Georges explanation and it worked just the other way around 8-|
>
>4096 positions on top above all
>8192 does something non visible
>
>As this values were available in VFP7 already, perhaps something was changed since then?

The values were here all along and they should be documented in the Help file now. I don't have VFP, so can not test here anyway.