>>In a way I think all the talk about experience, or lack of it, is misguided. Every new President who takes office is inexperienced in that job when they start. Every single one. The only thing we can try to evaluate is whether we think they will be up to it.
>
>You're missing Tracy's point : "If Obama and Hillary had to be 'vetted' for the job, they wouldn't make it. They wouldn't even qualify for a secret clearance let alone anything else based on the information available now."
>

I didn't miss it, I just didn't attach too much importance to it since it was so subjective. Vetted by whom? And who is to say what the vetters would have decided? That's only speculation, possibly projection.