>>>>The Open Society is the only workable solution.
>>>
>>>I would not even disagree, but do you know what this means for the american empire? It would lose its leading position
>>
>>Maybe. Maybe not.
>>
>>I think there are quite a few different factors involved.
>>
>>
>>>>The only reason you don't like it, is because you hate Bush, always have, always will, and are probably deep down jealous of the possibility of him being successful in revolutionizing the status quo worldwide.
>>>
>>>Ouch... Bush is irrelevant. He's a puppet as I always have believed. And jealous of Bush ?? If you'd say Clinton, that would be a different matter.
>>
>>How did Clinton change the world?
>>
>>Bush will be remembered as the man who said "No more dictators" and set us down a path. A long, difficult path. I'm not going to judge it so quickly this time.
>
>LOMAO... Read the link again, if this is true, what do you think it makes Bush to the rest of the world??


Someone who will be out of the picture in 10 months.

That's one of the advantages of the Open Society.


>Empires might be 'democracies' within (Though there is much to say about yours), but seldomly are for the outside
>
>You think you're living in a democracy with a president that has global peace and equal rights for every one on his agenda. There is an awfull lot of prove against that assumption. If you want, I'll explain those arguments in greater detail.


I think that's what was on Wolfowitz's mind, which explains why he would want to head the World Bank.