>Numbers can be fun. We can go back to 1994 before the Republican Congress was elected and compare those numbers to the ones you site to see the positives. We can do this throughout our history and as long as we restrict the years within certain cycles we can conclude whatever we want, right?

That is the point, and the problem with your posting. Simply taking the economic indicators from Part1 and using the timeframe from Part2 you get a much different picture. That, and the conclusions reached were at best misleading.