Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
So you think the War is Costing Too Much
Message
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01312540
Message ID:
01312842
Views:
12
>>>>A little under a decade ago:
>>>>
>>>>1) Consumer confidence: Record High 1/16/00
>>>>2) Gasoline prices in the United States reached an all-time inflation-adjusted
>>>>low in February (1999), dropping to less than $1 per gallon nationwide.
>>>>3) Unemployment Falls to 4.1%, Best in 30 Years
>>>>4) Median home price $160,000, primary use to live in, not an investment vehicle.
>>>>5) Tax rate for middle class 28%
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Since voting in a Republican President in 2000 we have seen:
>>>>
>>>>1) Consumer confidence plummet;
>>>>2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
>>>>3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
>>>>4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
>>>>5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
>>>>6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
>>>>7) Tax rate for middle class 25%
>>>>
>>>>The conclusion is clear, lower taxes are bad for the economy. :)
>>>>
>>>>Now why would anyone be surprised that people are more fond of the clinton years that the Bush years?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I liked those years. It was something new everyday. Travelgate, Monicagate, Bosniagate, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.
>>
>>The only resemblance of those "scandals" to Watergate is the names. (And what was Bosniagate supposed to be, anyway?) Bill Clinton's presidency was not exactly a long list of accomplishments but it was not as scandal-filled as his resolute enemies like to claim, either. The only thing I think was out of bounds was the pardon of Marc Rich.
>
>Dang, there were many more than that. I find it humorous that the Obama people are now starting to bring up the 94 dead people. hahaha... The name Charlie Trie comes to mind, whitewater, Hillary's investment acumen, do I have to keep going?

I think you do have to keep going, although not in the way you meant <g>. You can have the last word. I have already said I don't think those "scandals" amounted to much, or even had much to do with government in most cases. It serves no purpose to keep batting it back and forth. I am going to take a hiatus from jousting with right wingers and their bottomless anger. It never seems to get anywhere.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform