>>In fact MS did send this "fixed" file to some VFP users to test it.
>>I suppose they did aprove it, since the majos problem in the previous release was in the main index. Since the Index problem seemed to be Ok, I suspect the "testers" approved it. :-(
>>
>
>Guilty as charged. And I apologize to the community. I went looking to see whether the known problem was fixed, and then dipped in a little to see if I saw any other issues. I reported a couple of problems with an earlier build, but totally missed this.
>
>Tamar


Hi Tamar,

In fact, AFAIK, some people received this file, not just you.
If I were one of those, I would probably have missed this one too.

But as these testers are just users, they did not have a checklist for the problems that might occur.

I suspect that they used a different application to generate this new version, as we can see some differences in the UI of the Help.

IMO, this may be the real source of this problem :-(