*:This is a temp cursor with xx,xxx amount of records, since I do not have access to the real data *:I just can't really now how many records there are, but most likely there are thousands select CurIctfer go top in CurIctfer *:This is basically a wrapper routine for the SQLPrepare() VFP function if !PrepareSql(pnHandle, "insert into mySQlTable (cuid,cbatcno,cjeid, cacctid,cdescript,creference," +; "cyear, cpdno, cstatus, csource, dtrs, ntrsamt, ctrstype, ctrsno, cobjno) values (?CurIctfer.cuid, " +; "?CurIctfer.cbatcno, " +; "?CurIctfer.cjeid, ?CurIctfer.cacctid, ?CurIctfer.cdescript, ?CurIctfer.creference," + ; "?CurIctfer.cyear, ?CurIctfer.cpdno, ?CurIctfer.cstatus, ?CurIctfer.csource," +; " ?CurIctfer.cTrs, ?CurIctfer.ntrsamt, ?CurIctfer.cTrsType, ?CurIctfer.cTrsNo, ?CurIctfer.cObjNo)") return .f. endif *:and here is where the inserts are made, goes record by record and inserts each one to the back end *:database scan if !SetSqlData(, pnHandle) return .f. endif ENDSCAN =UnprepareSql(pnHandle)The customer claims this piece of code takes over 2 hours. so I was wondering if We change the Scan..Insert..Endscan and replace it with a append from kinda like this
*:I would create a Remote view, NoDataOnLoad, base on the mySQlTable, Table Buffering Select mySQlTable APPEND FROM CurIctfer TABLEUPDATE()do you guys think this would be faster, or slower?
DO WHILE .T. ME.Work() ENDDO