Amazing that you lay all of the blame for Obama's poor judgment and the media's publicity of it on Hillary...


>OK, bad analogy. I did make it hypothetically, but whatever.
>
>Yeah, time will tell whether it sticks. Obviously Hillary is hoping it will, or that something does.
>
>Dude (abides)
>
>>Dude, I was so far removed from Gates that it would have been completely irrelevent to whatever I did whatever he said. I mean, and please chime in old-timers, no one ever pinned on me anything negative in MS actions on VFP while I was there. Bad analogy.
>>
>>I'm pretty sure no one is trying to say Obama said these things, but that he had Wright as his pastor for 20 years and tacitly supported what Wright said. That's the growing opinion I think. Whether it sticks or not, time will tell.
>>
>>
>>>I agree Obama has been weakened by constantly being on the defensive for several weeks now. It's a slimy campaign the Clintons are running but you can't say it hasn't been successful.
>>>
>>>Re Wright, put it this way. What if when you were at Microsoft Bill Gates had said something outrageous? (Of course he never does, but for the sake of argument....) Would you have felt you should denounce him or quit your job?
>>>
>>>I think an effort has been made to get people thinking it was Obama himself who said these things. It wasn't.
>>>
>>>>Hey Mike,
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure I'd call it a manufactured issue. Candidates associations, especially with controversial figures, always gets vetted at some point. Whether it captures an audience is a different matter.
>>>>
>>>>Wright is a pretty radical fire-eater and Obama has a 20 year close association with him. That's more than a casual acquaintance or campaign donor.
>>>>
>>>>I think the Wright issue would have faded away in the mainstream if Wright hadn't suddenly come out with fresh controversy the past few days. Obama has to find a way to muzzle Wright for the remainder of the campaign for this to fade out. If Wright continues to speak out then it's going to seriously hamper Obama's campaign by constantly being on the defensive.
>>>>
>>>>>Obama was responding to the comments Rev. Wright made yesterday, not earlier ones. He didn't just out of the blue decide to backtrack on what happened before. If you read what Obama said, I think it sounds reasonable.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/29/obama.wright/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>The whole thing was a manufactured issue to begin with, the Clintons trying to tar Obama with guilt by association. I'm not sure what more they can try at this point. But they'll probably come up with something.