>>Though there is something in FOR EACH loop (FOXOBJECT)... Don't recall particular circumstances where it's needed...
>>
>>BTW, I think it was added in VFP8, not VFP9.
>
>For some reason I thought it was in VFP9. Maybe that was the first time I noticed it was available.
>
>Seems like this was named by a marketing dweeb since it really isn't strong typing at all.
>
>Oh well.
Good for documentation (code maintenance) purposes at least.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog