>These numbers don't support that:
>
>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
>
>Tuesday, April 29, 2008
>The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows Barack Obama attracing 46% of the vote while John McCain earns 44%. In a match-up with Hillary Clinton, it’s Clinton 46% McCain 45%.
>
>Shouldn't it be 65% Obama or Clinton? Or the economy (or something else) has taken the lead in the public's eye as the most important issue and they feel he can compete in that arean...

The rest goes to Nader, of course, but they have conveniently left him out of the picture.

Though, judging by the text of the attacks, Obama becomes likable. And pulling up the reverend as the nasty ace out of a sleeve - was there any truth to what I read, that he visited the Clintons officially when they were going over that rough patch? If that's true, no matter how I'd prefer to see a woman leading this country, I wouldn't want the first one to be such a wrong one.

But then, I'm only an observer.