You may be right. I was listening on the radio and heard the popular argument bandied back and forth. On the radio Michigan and Florida were not even mentioned. I saw the same on CNN. These articles contradict both the radio discussion and CNN:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7371367.stmhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/clinton_cant_win_popular_vote.html>>I agree with you that in many voters' eyes Obama is winning because he won more delegates, but Obama has more delegates because he won those smaller caucus states. Hillary actually received more votes overall.
>
>Not sure that's true. I know the numbers depend on whether you count Florida and Michigan. I think you can make some argument for counting Florida, where everyone was on the ballot, but none for counting Michigan, where everyone except Hillary played by the rules and withdrew.
>
>Tamar
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
