You are totally right Russell. I agree (re: AFUG).
I have discovered that the world of a cell in a grid is split into two parts.
1) Data-bound controls
2) Non-Data-bound controls
The Data bound controls respond to grid data-binding code and is pretty much non-negotiable.
On the flip-side of non-data-bound controls: these are controls like images, where the image can be pointed at a file on a row-by-row basis within the grid column. The methods take advantage of the cell-by-cell firing of the Dynamic properties. Because the data-binding code on the grid-column is focused on true data-binding controls, controls like images and so on scoot under the radar, but get the benefit of Dynamic code.
I have not found a way to cross the line between these two without getting into complex "creative" solutions. There are easier ways to handle the matter so I am shelving the idea for the time being.
This does bring up a wish: I wish I could control the data-binding process at the cell level rather than handing it off to the column object and being limited by what it can and cannot do.
That said -- it makes me wonder about inter-op between VFP and .NET and if there is a work-around I can take advantage of. However, I am on to implementing a solution for our business needs now and cannot wait any longer. I will revisit the matter as time permits.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only