>>>>>
>>>>>How do you feel about the current gun control case being heard. Its another potential example of judges circumventing the will of the majority to preserve the rights of a minority?
>>>>
>>>>Gun ownership is a right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment. It shall not be infringed without modifying the Constitution. As I stated in another response, marriage, same-sex or otherwise, is not a right.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I agree, according to the 2nd amendment I should be free to purchase as many and any type of weapon I want but certainly is not the case.
>>>
>>>Education is not a constitutional right but if the government is going to be in that game they can not discriminate on who receives it and at what level of quality. Why should marriage be different?
>>
>>Education is not a constitutional right and the government does discriminate on who receives it and its quality. Compare public education in Compton to Bel Air and tell me again how its all doled out evenly.
>
>So because education is not a constitutional right you are ok if the majority chooses to only provide it to white christian childen? And courts should do nothing to stop that?

I'm not discussing what I'm OK with or what "should" be done. I'm pointing out that claiming education is equal as doled out by the government is not valid. As with most of what the government gets involved in, it is inefficient, ineffective and smothers the rights of the citizenry. Why would marriage be any different?

If you want my opinion on education I'll offer it, but it seems out of scope for the discussion at present.