>>
>>But as I look at your example, I am wondering what is better/faster/more efficient: 1. Creating a temp table and, say, inserting 20 or 50 rows into the temp table (which means calling SQLExec so many times. Or 2. Creating a string of values to be used in the IN clause of one SQL Select against the "myTable" without temp table. What is your (and others) feeling on that?
>
>It can be a single SQLexec call. Speed depends. If all would be done in a single call then building the IN list create a shorter command to send over the wire. If values would be send at different times thenthe table approach might be better.
>One or the other SQL server process it fast.
>Cetin
Thank you, Cetin.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
