>Obviously, you've never been to Montana. There are thousands of hunters out there.

And your point is that they are hunting car owners so guns in the seats and guns in the back windows aren't enough? Ok, I guess if the hunters surround the car owner, then maybe he does need all the firepower he can muster.

>
>>>>>http://www.kmbc.com/news/16345443/detail.html
>>>>
>>>>And not just any gun -- a semi-automatic! They're not messing around.
>>>>
>>>>There is a scene in "Bowling for Columbine" where Michael Moore visits a Michigan bank which is giving free guns to new customers. Moore to bank manager: "Are you sure it's a good idea to be handing out guns in a bank?"
>>>
>>>Yeah, that was a classic.
>>>
>>>OTOH, with this car/gun promotion, you can get everything you need for drive-by shootings at one place!
>>
>>The really weird thing though, is that as the guy says in the article that he sees nothing wrong with telling people they can protect themselves, then he goes on:
>>
>>

Moore said most of his customers already own weapons.
>>
>>"I get in a vehicle to bid a trade, there are guns in the seats, guns in the back windows.
>>Everybody has a gun -- there's no backlash," Moore said.

>>
>>And he wants them to have another gun? How much protection does one car need?