>I agree completely. It will surprise me if later historians find the invasion of Iraq to be any less of a fiasco than current ones do, but I've been wrong before!

Hell of a coincidence. I was wrong once before too. I think it was 1962, but I don't recall the circumstances.

>
>PS - I just asked Truman and he didn't answer.
>
>>I will be curious to know your reaction in 10-20 years when we can accurately judge the events of the last 7 years. Time has a funny way of adding perspective. Just ask Truman.
>>
>>>Another interpretation is we are constrained from pursuing all options with Iran due to fallout from the lunatic exercise in Iraq. But maybe that's just me.
>>>
>>>>In context, he is completely crazy. It amazes me that a fairly cosmopolitan country such as Iran keeps a guy like that in power.
>>>>
>>>>I can only believe that our quietude towards Iran insofar as their craziness and supporting insurgents is due to secret knowledge of some sort. Or so I'd hope.
>>>>
>>>>>From the horses mouth:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080602124328.f6eyi8y1&show_article=1