Nice comeback!

Bob

>For the sake of full disclosure (from the same article):
>
>The Fraternal Order of Police, which represents public safety officers, whose pensions are invested in Exxon, has publicly opposed the shareholder effort to change company policy.
>
>“The Rockefeller resolution threatens to degrade the value of Exxon Mobil,” the organization wrote in a letter to Mr. Tillerson that criticized the splitting of the top executive jobs.
>
>
>
>>Everyone wants to blame Exxon for the high gas prices. Guess who Exxon really is?
>>
>>From a recent NYT article (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/business/27exxon.html )
>>
>>Nineteen institutional investors with 91 million shares announced last week that they would support resolutions asking Exxon to separate the top executive positions and tackle global warming. They included the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System and the New York City Employees’ Retirement System.