>>>>Good catch with LEFT JOIN!
>>>
>>>:-)
>>>My first thought was INNER, but then I read that Steven wants ALL records from Tasks :-)
>>
>>Attention to details usually pays much <g>
>
>Don't say this to me. Usually I skip ALL details :-)
>That was the exception which confirms the rule :-)

The funniest thing is that there is no ALL records in the original requirement. You must have been reading Steven's mind :)

That shows a true genious :)