>>>>>>>>>>Or if "discard" means to throw something away, does "card" mean to save it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>This one just hit me today.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If 'to card' means to check an ID, then does 'to discard' mean to not check an ID?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>How come you can incapacitate something but not aztecpacitate - or mayapacitate for that matter?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The Azetc and the Mayan cultures were far more secretive than the Inca. Nobody really knows for sure whether or not you can aztecpacitate or mayapacitate anybody.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I didn't procipate a reply from you! :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I wanted to disablunt you.
>>>>>
>>>>>You don't misusually do
>>>>>
>>>>>BTW disapblunt surely?
>>>>
>>>>I know. I don't usufoe make spelling misgives, and I didn't fakeise after I sent it... too late.
>>>
>>>As we're using antonyms you don't need the negatives
>>
>>No, the antonyms make the negatives absolutely necessary. If I say "I did fakeise after I sent it", that would me that I didn't realise, so I have to use the negative to counter the antonym. The first sentence, of course, contained 2 negatives which cancelled each other and I was able to construct the sentence as normal.
>>
>>Gee, I thought you made this game up, and you don't even know the rules? ;)
>
>Sorry. I read that as "I did fakeise till after I sent it". My eyes are a bit blurry.
>And the double-negative in the 1st sentence: a master stroke of lack of supertlety.

Thanks. I'm used to plower. I'm not bteetotalering.