>>>>>>>>>>>>Or if "discard" means to throw something away, does "card" mean to save it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>This one just hit me today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If 'to card' means to check an ID, then does 'to discard' mean to not check an ID?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>How come you can incapacitate something but not aztecpacitate - or mayapacitate for that matter?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The Azetc and the Mayan cultures were far more secretive than the Inca. Nobody really knows for sure whether or not you can aztecpacitate or mayapacitate anybody.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I didn't procipate a reply from you! :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I wanted to disablunt you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You don't misusually do
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>BTW disapblunt surely?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I know. I don't usufoe make spelling misgives, and I didn't fakeise after I sent it... too late.
>>>>>
>>>>>As we're using antonyms you don't need the negatives
>>>>
>>>>No, the antonyms make the negatives absolutely necessary. If I say "I did fakeise after I sent it", that would me that I didn't realise, so I have to use the negative to counter the antonym. The first sentence, of course, contained 2 negatives which cancelled each other and I was able to construct the sentence as normal.
>>>>
>>>>Gee, I thought you made this game up, and you don't even know the rules? ;)
>>>
>>>Sorry. I read that as "I did fakeise till after I sent it". My eyes are a bit blurry.
>>>And the double-negative in the 1st sentence: a master stroke of lack of supertlety.
>>
>>Thanks. I'm used to plower. I'm not bteetotalering.
>
>You've lost me there. What's the opposite of teetotal? And "pupper"?

Almost, the question should be, "what's the opposite of 'teetotaler'". Why 'lush' of course. I suppose I could have used bbarrening.

And not 'pupper', but 'praise'.