>>>>>>Mike,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tsk, tsk... You still do not get it... there is no need to line them up and shoot them when you have so many nukes rusting somewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now you're talking. We need to cycle some of the older nukes out and replenish with the new models. We could use them to help the muslims get those virgins via martyrdom!<g>
>>>>
>>>>Do yo object if the larger part of the world insists in less polluted area and solve the problem so that you bomb yourself? This makes most people happy (i.e democracy in action), you get rid of the old nukes, save the money for the new ones and fill the stock for the virgins. And you would fullfill your own law, since the islamic terror was reared by the US so you are to be count as a supporter. (Feed them via taxes and I bet you voted for Ronald Reagan)
>>>>
>>>>Agnes
>>>
>>>Actually, the economy here was the best it had been for decades after Reagan took office. Unless you meant something different.
>>
>>The influence a politican have on economy is overvalued. At least in shorter terms. (I don't call folks like Robbie Mugabe politican)
>>And yes, I mean the winding up of terrorist the Reagan started in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
>
>If it's overvalued, why did you use it as an example in the first place? It was your argument mechanism , not mine.

??

I have no idea what you are reffering to. I've said nothing about economics. Just that John as a tax pair to the U.S. has paid for the raise of the islamic terrorism. In that sense he must be counted as a supporter of terrorism. And if he is, he must use his own law to himself.