>I'm just looking at this thread for the first time (since you mentioned
>this on the IRC yesterday).
>
>I've got a number of tests to run, but, I'm going to run this under
>FPW2.6 under WFWG3.11, VFP5 under Windows 95, and
>both VFP5 and VFP3 under Windows NT 3.51 on a Windows
>network. (We don't want a Novell network involved. <g>)
>
>I probably won't get to test it fully and properly until the (U.S.)
>Thanksgiving Day weekend (Nov. 28-Dec 1). But I'll give it a
>shot and see how pronounced these changes are. I don't
>doubt though that someone at MS has tinkered with this
>inadvertently or not.

Ok, thanks, I'll wait for your results.

BTW, as someone was mentioning it yesterday, I tried the test by having the table not being part of a DBC and it was not a factor.