Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
This would be bad, bad, bad
Message
From
25/06/2008 16:55:14
 
 
To
25/06/2008 08:39:36
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
International
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01326447
Message ID:
01326771
Views:
16
>Oh thank god. The state the middle east is in isn't as bad as it would have been. Thats nice Charles that you can justify the mess we have made with "what might have been". Actually effective sanctions and political action where working but weren't exciting enough for the men in cowboy hats.
>
I think you are mischaracterizing what I said. I said we know the consequences of what happened, we don't know the consequences that would have unrolled hat another course been taken. i'm not justifying anything, I'm only saying it was analogous in that you had Saddam talking big and having a history of attacking Israel. That is not a recipe for long-term peace.

"Do nothing" is a nice way to absolve onself from responsibility for anything, but there are still consequences. Things were going in a bad direction in 2002. We don't know where that would have led 6 years later. Two things are fairly certain : the UN would have been useless and the Israelis wouldn't have hesitated to do what they thought they needed to do.

In hindsight, it might have been a much better idea to instigate another Iran/Iraq war instead of taking on the responsiblity of confronting each individually. Would have been quite disruptive to the region but may have been a lot better for us (yeah, I know how much I'll get flamed for this and Yoko Ono will probably cancel my invite to the Hamptons, but hey, I'm bored today.)

>>No, I was thinking more in terms of Saddam's bombast which had convinced the world and his own general's that he had some very nasty stuff. Israel takes out suspected weapons facilities somewhere in Iraq, Iraq shoots *anything* at Israel (never know what is on the warhead) and Israel decides to put an end to the problem once and for all. Probably not Baghdad, but certainly a wider Middle East war that would have been far more destructive than what actually happened in 2003 and since.
>>
>>>> but there is also a chance that it forestalled another thread unreeling in which Baghdad would now be glowing in the dark or would look like the surface of the moon.
>>>
>>>I'm a bit surprized on the location:
>>>I can easily imagine glowing spots somewhere in the wild if Saddam had started up WMD development hidden "out there" and no reaction from other countries happened. A Poe-inspired "purloined WMD factory" right in Baghdad I see as highly improbable, so for Baghdad to influence global heat statistics you probably speculate not on a surgical strike but massive (retaliation?) strike. As I don't see Israel trying to invade Iraq directly via Jordania, Syria or airlifting that scenario would as I see it only happen if Israel missed the right opportunity and retaliated to the gassing of Tel Aviv or Haifa.
>>>
>>>While I realize that Israel is automatically backed into a corner by their location they are too dependant on others to start with a massive first strike IMHO.
>>>
>>>regards
>>>
>>>thomas


Charles Hankey

Though a good deal is too strange to be believed, nothing is too strange to have happened.
- Thomas Hardy

Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm-- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.

-- T. S. Eliot
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
- Ben Franklin

Pardon him, Theodotus. He is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform