>Yes, I guess they are overdue military action?

Look - Saddam was done because he was a potential danger, because there was a doubt he may be developing nukes (or already having them), he once tried to occupy some territory (not for long), he closely cooperated with the CIA at some point, he was repressing the Shia, and there was a dozen UN resolutions stacked against him. These guys have done all that plus it's known that they have some nukes, no bluffing, and they have 60+ resolutions stacked, and they were repressing a Shia population. It wouldn't be a first time that a country gets bombed by NATO for stuff like that - happened to Saddam, happened to Sloba... for less.