Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Supreme Court Upholds an Individual Right to Bear Arms
Message
From
28/06/2008 17:20:16
 
 
To
28/06/2008 07:12:53
General information
Forum:
News
Category:
Social
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01326977
Message ID:
01327482
Views:
17
>>>>>>Sure, I understand that, but if, as you said, "it would not have occurred to any of the Founders that the Government could http://www.levelextreme.com/SupportArea.aspx?Session=6B4A6843496177466B73303D2075674E685967393273352B525168396C734F4A44586745672F5253682F694B55
>>>[Canada] forbid citizens to own guns", how did it occur to them to make sure? Most times, if something could not occur to me, I generally don't rush out and make sure of doing something about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Okay, I get it. Should have said "It would not have ocurred to any of them that the Government should or should be allowed to forbid citizens to own guns."
>>>>
>>>>Hah! Pedantry prevails! I guess I'd better go back to using smilies. You probably would have figured it out right away.
>>>
>>>At least we are not in Iran or Saudi Arabia , where they do not have the right bare arms. !
>>
>>As I've said before; as long as you have the right to bear arms, there should also be an inverse right to arm bears.
>
>Sounds like my view of sport hunting or bull-fighting - fine as long as it's a fair fight.

Absolutely. I've said for years that if a person wants to hunt bear, he should get himself a good set of claws and have at it.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform