I think that estimate is way off. Maybe more in the realm of 30-40% at the most. I don't know a single couple who signed a pre-nup. It is only typical of the very wealthy where parties want to protect their assets they earned before the marriage. Of course, it could be much higher in California - that place is a world of its own...
>How is this different to a prenuptial agreement? I think that was the point of the judge and Nicholas.
>
>By the way, looking for the right wording I found this quote from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenuptial_agreement>
>"It is estimated that 86% of marriages in the United States have prenuptial agreements and 79% in Canada."
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
