OK.

>Hey Mike,
>
>I didnt respond directly because I have been swamped with other posts. I remain concerned about the effect of this article on our troops.
>
>>PS -- Interesting that you didn't respond to my response after I read the article in question. Are you sure it revealed secret details that could endanger U.S. soldiers? If so, which details were those? Because I sure didn't see any. Calling that article treasonous seems a little hysterical to me, frankly.