>>Perry,
>>
>>Your comments would be interesting if you had any credibility left but since it was long ago proven that you're a knee-jerk partisan I fail to see why I, or anyone else, should appreciate your commentary. Fox doesn't have a strong bias, unlike CNN and the rest, which is why it bothers you.
>
>John-- are you serious? You think Fox has no bias? I think you're a bright guy and I find it hard to believe that you think that. I'll freely admit that MSNBC leans left (especially Olberman) despite some appearances to the contrary (Scarborough and Buchachan, in particular). How can you say that Fox doesn't lean to the right? Their selection of material, their manner of presenting it, etc.
>
>Tamar
Fox may "lean" to the right, but look at CNN they are bent over double to the left. When Fox does a talk show they put equal parts conservative, and socialist. The left routinely stacks the deck and tries to beat the one conservative down. See - The View, Bill Maher, CNN's roundtable discussions, etc. There is really NO comparison. That is why Fox is leaving the other news agencies in the dust. People (most anyway, except those afflicted with the mental disorder of liberalism) can see through the left's strategy, and we choose to watch news that will present facts, and when airing discussions, they present both sides. I don't want to watch a show that doesn't have a fair amount of debate, and I mean real debate.
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright