>>>So, you've not only discounted his service, but also his courage, and also his time in Congress which includes several key committees.
>>>
>>>Meanwhile, Mr. Hope and Change, with practically ZERO experience in any area needed for a leader captures your imagination.
>>>
>>>And you don't see a problem with that?
>>
>>That's easy John, she sees another Carter in him. I see Satan.
>
>You suggest that I liked Carter; I didn't. Too long ago to remember who I supported that year, and I couldn't vote until the general election, since I turned 18 in September, 1976.
>
>Tamar

I suggest you would like any candidate the Dems put out there - regardless. Your positions have been far left on almost every discussion I've seen. I know mine seem far right, but when confronted by facts, not emotion, I can change my positions. You and my other liberal friends take whatever dogfood the dems serve up. I think you should take a look at the facts, and weight that against the emotion. Case in point, and I think I've cited this before: Dems/liberals want to feel good about themselves, so they come up with systems they think will help. They don't care about the outcomes, so long as they "tried". HOV lanes would be a great example. They waste gas, they restrict highway access, during the times it is most needed. The end result is, they don't force anyone to join the carpool, they actually have an outcome that is 180 degrees off what was "intended."

Repubs/conservatives want to know what the outcome of a program is, regardless as to the touchy-feely aspect. If it doesn't work, scrap it, and try something else. All systems should be measured for their outcomes vs intentions.

In a nutshell, from my perspective, that is the difference. with the exception of the libs who will cling to a lie, even when they know it isn't true.