Neither article goes directly into the notorious circumstances behind the case. (A link included in a reader response does -- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24670474/). A lot of people were left frustrated that the woman was not charged with anything. The charge of creating a false identity is a stretch, and would be a horrible precedent, but evidently it was the best they could come up with. I doubt it will go anywhere in court (IANAL).
