Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Stored procedures vs. functions
Message
 
To
08/07/2008 08:21:29
John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvania, United States
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
The Mere Mortals .NET Framework
Environment versions
Environment:
C# 2.0
OS:
Windows 2000
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01329296
Message ID:
01329725
Views:
9
I don't remember all of them. I confess that I was suffering a bit from information overload. One was that the functions may be referenced from SQL Server commands while procedures may not. That one definitely makes sense to me. I can ask him to give me some more detail, if you like. He is someone whose opinion I respect quite a bit, which is why I wanted to raise the issue.

>>BLG is the Mere Mortals Business Layer Generator. Referencing stored procedures is one of the enhancements in version 2.4.
>>
>>>>I have been working with someone who is a more experienced SQL programmer than I. He suggested that I use functions rather than procedures for single table returns. When I use functions rather than procedures the code compiles without any problem. However, I notice that the BLG does not list the functions. Will using functions cause problems down the line? Thanks.
>>>
>>>What is BLG and this is an interesting statement, I'd like more information about it.
>
>
>I think that the advice to use funcitons over stored procs is a bit off the mark. Could you post the reasons why that statement is made?
Linda Harmes
HiBit Technologies, Inc.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform