>Maybe they simply have the integrity to NOT broadcast what should be held private, Have you ever considered that possibility? You are not a part in this, I am not a part in this, we have absolutely NO right to ask for any apology or any comments from anyone in this case. This was, and still is, either a private matter or a legal matter.

I don't agree with Peter on this - or most anything really - but I believe that their integrity has already been determined.

>To make it perfectly clear: I do not take ANY side in this. I just want to stop this ridiculous argument where everyone seems to know everything, but the truth is that only two or three people really know what happened. I don't accuse anyone or hint that anyone is lying, I simply state that we don't know enough to make any conclusion or judgement. And secondly, we simply are not parts in this.

So much for the whole community aspect to this, eh?