>>OK, you are a part of this, but why do you insist on involving the rest of us? Why does everything have to be so da*n public? If this a case involving four people, including you, why can't this stay between the four of you? And if you all come to an agreement, THEN it's time to "go public" with whatever you have agreed should be public.
>
>Why you would not simply say, that it is OK in your book to attack a person the way they did and then sent the letters to the employer and then even try to sue the employer for letting the letters be known?

Because it sounds better to him to say it the other way. Makes him feel that he is being neutral when I believe he very much thinks that Andy and Company walk on water or something.