>>>Maybe they simply have the integrity to NOT broadcast what should be held private, Have you ever considered that possibility? You are not a part in this, I am not a part in this, we have absolutely NO right to ask for any apology or any comments from anyone in this case. This was, and still is, either a private matter or a legal matter.
>>
>>I don't agree with Peter on this - or most anything really - but I believe that their integrity has already been determined.
>
>Huh? I'm in your twit filter, so you can't fully know what to agree with or not.
>
Post quoting, Peter. Unless he twits everybody with whom you have a discussion, he sees your posts, or at least parts of them.

>>>To make it perfectly clear: I do not take ANY side in this. I just want to stop this ridiculous argument where everyone seems to know everything, but the truth is that only two or three people really know what happened. I don't accuse anyone or hint that anyone is lying, I simply state that we don't know enough to make any conclusion or judgement. And secondly, we simply are not parts in this.
>>
>>So much for the whole community aspect to this, eh?