>>>>>>>>No, I don't speculate, but I really, truthfully want to end this discussion. You say I speculate when I write "don't you think something happened before this?" Everyone who has followed this discussion the last year, know that AK caught NN in the act when she used AK's password. So something did happen before. So this is fact, not specualtion or insinuation. Can we please, please end this mud throwing here and now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If you write 'this and that happened before' and it can be verified, that's not speculating. If you write 'something happened before' without being more specific, then others cannot verify it. That's speculating and even insinuating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You want to end this, that's fine with me. But was it mud throwing? Not in my eyes, not from my perspective. Were YOU mud throwing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>When I said "mud throwing" I was not referring to anyone specific.
>>>>>
>>>>>Literally you write: Can we please, please end this mud throwing here and now?
>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps you should choose your words with more care...
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers
>>>>
>>>>We = you, me and everyone else. OK?
>>>
>>>I deny having thrown with mud. You apparently do not deny having thrown with mud. OK?
>>
>>Re-read my previous message until you understand it.
>
>Oh, I now understand. You are simply incapable of choosing your words with more care.
>
>EOF

I was just about to reply to your message to Tore some 18 levels up this thread hierarchy
(cc everbody in this thread),
but then that might cause endless recursion with possible c5 error at the end <g>

Whereas I share opinion that all this should be laid to rest.