No problem. You have a good one, too.

>I'm soooo stupid. I didn't get your clap joke. Sorry for that. From that point I would've understand how the rest was to be considered.
>
>Nothing to argue about. Have a nice day Russell.
>
>
>>Sometimes I feel like they are overused and some statements can be interpreted as humorous without them, but it is the safer approach, I guess. Not being able to clap because I have too much typing to do is kind of a silly statement, so I thought you'd see it that way (it was a response to your joke about "let's all clap together now", after all).
>>
>>So let me just say ... ;~), <g>, <s> and all that stuff ... I have no interest in arguing and see nothing for us to argue about. I hope you feel the same.
>>
>>
>>>You don't make it easy.
>>>
>>>At least in my first reply there was a smiley. From that point I assumed you understood that my reply should have been taken lightly.
>>>
>>>I understand that you're very busy today but using a little smiley here and there would have helped a lot on your part.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Negative? Just explaining my comments and saying you took them a little too seriously (as you felt I took John's a little too seriously). I don't see that as negative. I think you're the one being negative and taking swipes at me with the "I'm lucky" comment. I was trying to be humorous and you're using it to insult. I don't even see what there is to argue about.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I have a feeling that whatever I say you'll find the way to find the negative side about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm lucky you have too much typing to do