Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Seymour Hersh and his war against the US
Message
 
À
10/07/2008 16:58:23
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
International
Divers
Thread ID:
01327555
Message ID:
01330570
Vues:
22
John, you stake out such conflicting and changing positions on this patriotism BS that its beyond tiresome. You make the reality-free assertion that Obama brought this up without anyone questioning his patriotism, but later concede the obvious. You then make an equally absurd claim about peoples' patriotic 'insecurities' based on this conceded point. You state that you'd be extremely bent if someone questioned my patriotism, yet in this case you have no qualms about giving a pass to people who do just that and instead take aim at the person who's the target of the smears. You attempt to downplay how effective the smears have been, but you echo the very same smear material when you post stuff like:

A good friend, and someone we all know, calls Obama the "Manchurian Candidate". Maybe so.

Its hard to take you seriously when you're off in the weeds like that. Frankly, i find it hard to take anyone seriously when they prattle on with their own opinions as to what they believe to be other people's attitudes & 'insecurities' about their own sense of patriotism.


>I am making an observation. That doesn't make it partisan, inasmuch as calling the sky blue wouldn't either. Lighten up, Chris. If Obama is so thin-skinned that he goes overboard about what a few mean-spirited rightwingers say then he doesn't have the temperament to be President. I recall Kerry doing the same "boo hoo" crap in '04.
>
>It is amusing to me; as amusing to me is the knee-jerk right wing marriage amendment movement.
>
>>John, dont get me wrong. I do realize that questioning someone's patriotism is a time-worn tradition. Tis the last refuge of a scoundrel and all. You calling someone partisan is hilarious. Your claim that "no one questioned his patriotism", which requires ignoring a year and half's worth of 'patriotism' BS, is partisan. Your ridiculing of Obama's long overdue pushback as a sign of "insecurity" is partisan. Your claim that libs feel the need to "constantly state their patriotism" is also partisan. Why dont you give the patriotism cr*p a rest. It makes you look silly.
>>
>>
>>>Perhaps. And perhaps you failing to recognize time-worn campaign tactics is laughable. Obama is thrashing around with accusations and an almost hourly change in position on key issues. To me, it's incredulous that anyone can't see that, in fact, must be a willfully blind partisan. Oh wait, the constant use of "Faux"....oh yeah, a kool-aid drinker. Sucks to be a partisan, Chris. Wake up.
>>>
>>>>John, its a smear campaign meant to influence public opinion. Its been going on since Jan '07 when Faux did their madrassa hit piece on him, and this 'issue' had long ago reached critical mass, and he simply defended himself against them. Whether you wish to apply some arbitrary threshold of defending oneself against the smears only after some politicians have assisted in the smearing is irrelevant to his decision to defend himself. It would be stupid not to. Building on your laughable "Obama brought this up without anyone questioning his patriotism" claim, that his decision to push back "signifies insecurity" or that "they have to constantly state their patriotism" is simply more drivel. Perhaps the act of dems defending themselves against BS like this is unique to you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I don't think the "talking heads" count and I guess that's where we differ. I think it demeans Obama (or McCain for that matter) to worry about what some op-ed says. Again, I believe that he's making a statement of indignation to push a point and not really because it's a big deal. That's the way these guys deal, Chris.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Not a single news program has questioned his patriotism. Analysts have, yes..."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>John, you're walking backwards by leaps and bounds. But i'm glad you finally got around to admitting it. Although you sound like Clinton with his "depends on the definition of IS is" contortions. This has been going on since Faux ran their madrassa story in Jan of '07. Pretending it hasnt is indefensible, as you have finally demonstrated. As i stated before, its delusional to claim that no one was questioning Obama's patriotism.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform