>>>>To me there is a clear distinction between a freedom fighter and a terrorist. I wonder whether someone up here could give me a reasonable explanation between the two. And really it should not be depended on which side you're on.
>>>>
>>>>Walter,
>>>
>>>I'll give it a shot.
>>>
>>>Terrorists, by their policy, will intensionally target innocent civilians to cause terror, thus they are called "terrorists". That's one.
>>
>>That is a very good start... so how does this contrast the usage of the word terrorist practised all too often?
>
>Not sure what you're asking, but many words are used too liberally/loosely.

We sure wouldn't want to do anything liberally <g>.