>>>>>>>To me there is a clear distinction between a freedom fighter and a terrorist. I wonder whether someone up here could give me a reasonable explanation between the two. And really it should not be depended on which side you're on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Walter,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'll give it a shot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Terrorists, by their policy, will intensionally target innocent civilians to cause terror, thus they are called "terrorists". That's one.
>>>>>
>>>>>That is a very good start... so how does this contrast the usage of the word terrorist practised all too often?
>>>>
>>>>Not sure what you're asking, but many words are used too liberally/loosely.
>>>
>>>We sure wouldn't want to do anything liberally <g>.
>>
>>damn, you got me again.
>>
>>wait, that's a word. it's in the dictionary.
>
>Of course it is. It wasn't even always an epithet.
>
>I was only making a tiny joke, at no one's expense. This place is getting a little humor impaired!


Yes. I NEW that.

It was tiny. Almost missed it.