>>Try it before you buy it, but she didn't have the money to buy it. It was a heavy-handed response, but she was still wrong. Plus, 12 years old and out on her own? Is that normal?
>>
>>http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1035897/Nailed-Security-guard-police-officers-interrogated-grammar-girl-painted-fingernail-Boots.html
>
>Ridicilous. Put her in an acceltertaed class and be done with it..duuuh.

Now I see why we need these grammar girls :).

But then, we may need physics girls, maths girls etc etc...

I wonder why did the reporter feel the need to mention that the poor grammar specimen was "a member of a Christian youth fellowship group"? Was that the same kind of image buildup as the "was a member of Communist Youth and took part in voluntary federal labor campouts three times, originates in a poor workers' family"? IOW, if the girl belonged to a different (or no) religion, would she be more or less (non-)guilty? At least in the eyes of the public, to whom the reporter is supposing (*).

----
(*) - is there a better word to describe "assumes a role of suppository"?