>>>In my experience, Oracle was more robust and more reliable than anything else I worked with. ...
>>
>>In Turkey you cannot find a big company uses MS-SQL. All of ours big companies use Oracle. They think about MS-SQL "It's just for small firms, it's just a babytoy".
>
>Oracle marketing a la IBM in the 60's and 70's.
>
>Oracle is a solid DBMS. Very expensive, difficult to work with, but solid.
>
>SQL Server is generally much less expensive, easier to work with, scalable, and solid, but if the Oracle salespeople have done their jobs then SQL Server won't be given a chance.

You have to admit that Oracle is a technically superior product. For if it wasn't then M$ surely would have overtaken it by now as they have just about everything else by charging less.

Regards,