> Agressor and father with guns

I was sure that you would say that. I can't figure out why it's safer, but trying to open your eyes seem impossible.

>If you take away guns, criminals will use other means to kill the innocent. Are youy too blindfolded (brainwashed?) by the gun control freaks to get this?

Sure, a determined criminal will do whatever it take to kill someone if it's what he intended in the first place. But I'm sure that the aggressor didn't wake up in the morning saying "Today I will kill someone". He had a quick access to a gun in a moment of fury and committed the crime. Without the gun, he may have gotten into a fight and I hope that bystanders would have time to intervene before it goes too far.

What do you about wild shots? The aggressor or the father miss it target and kill an innocent bystanders instead?