A regional thing, yes, and also a rural/urban thing.

>Maybe it's a regional thing, but I disagree.
>
>>I don't agree. In most cases, the innocent will not have a gun, even if they have the right to have one.
>>
>>>In most cases, the innocent don't have guns anyway.
>>>
>>>Exactly!!
>>>
>>>Give the law abiding citizen the right to defend himself, and crime will go down.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>If everyone has easy access to guns, how do we know the difference? In most cases, the innocent don't have guns anyway.
>>>>
>>>>>Lets make it easier for the innocent to kill the psychopaths.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yeah, but why make it easier for psychopaths to kill the innocent?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You're too blindfolded (brainwashed?) about guns that you can't see clear. Which is safer for everyone (agressor, father and son, bystanders)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>- Agressor and father with guns
>>>>>>>>- Agressor and father without guns
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Can carry it unlocked? No
>>>>>>>>>Can carry it Loaded? No
>>>>>>>>>Can carry it concealed? No
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Father loses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agressor and father with guns
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If you take away guns, criminals will use other means to kill the innocent. Are youy too blindfolded (brainwashed?) by the gun control freaks to get this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE - PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE!!