>I can see your concern, however, how is it better to side with the 1/3 of your customers instead of the 2/3rd? That concerns me as a customer. How is the minority carrying the vote? Not many businesses would stay in business if that was the practice, unless the profits gained by the 1/3rd outweighed the profits of the 2/3rd. Is that the case? Do you somehow gain more profit from the 1/3rd who voted against? That is the only way it would make business sense...

It is not about that. My point was in reference that in order to adjust something that is extremely sensitive or to deviate from the way we have handled that so far, which is that banned members are usually banned for life, it would take a much more united vote/agreement from the community. In that sense, 2/3 is still not enough. Because, as soon as I would change that policy, assuming they would be back here, or some banned suspension lifted, I would get 1/3 against it and this would get worst than before.